15.3 C
New York
Friday, September 29, 2023

UN body’s motion on Quran burning: How did your country vote? | Islamophobia News

The movement introduced after the Muslim holy e book was desecrated in Sweden was disputed, however handed.

The United Nations Human Rights Council has authorized a decision on non secular hatred and bigotry within the wake of a Quran-burning stunt in Sweden that led to protests throughout the Muslim world.

The decision handed on Wednesday was opposed by america and European Union, which stated it conflicts with their positions on human rights and freedom of expression.

Pakistan and different Organisation of Islamic Cooperation international locations, involved by the incident final month exterior Stockholm’s primary mosque, throughout which an Iraqi immigrant desecrated the Quran on the Eid al-Adha vacation, secured an pressing debate on the UN’s high rights physique on Tuesday.

“We should see this clearly for what it’s: incitement to non secular hatred, discrimination and makes an attempt to impress violence,” Pakistan’s Overseas Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari advised the Geneva-based council through video on Tuesday.

He stated that such acts occurred underneath “authorities sanction and with the sense of impunity”.

Bhutto Zardari’s remarks had been echoed by ministers from Iran, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia.

“Cease abusing freedom of expression,” stated Indonesia’s Overseas Minister Retno Marsudi. “Silence means complicity.”

UN human rights chief Volker Turk advised the council that inflammatory acts towards Muslims, in addition to different religions or minorities, are “offensive, irresponsible and mistaken”.

The Swedish authorities condemned the Quran burning as “Islamophobic”, however added that the nation had a “constitutionally-protected proper to freedom of meeting, expression and demonstration”.

On Tuesday, France’s ambassador Jerome Bonnafont famous that human rights “defend folks – not religions, doctrines, beliefs or their symbols … It’s neither for the United Nations nor for states to outline what’s sacred.”

How did your nation vote?

United Nations Human Rights Council resolutions should not legally binding, however are seen as sturdy political commitments by states.

Tuesday’s movement referred to as on international locations to “impede the prevention and prosecution of acts and advocacy of non secular hatred”.

INTERACTIVE - UN approves motion against Quran burning vote-1689155275
(Al Jazeera)

Right here is how international locations voted:


Algeria; Argentina; Bangladesh; Bolivia; Cameroon; China; Cuba; Eritrea; Gabon; Gambia; India; Ivory Coast; Kazakhstan; Kyrgyzstan; Malawi; Malaysia; Maldives; Morocco; Pakistan; Qatar; Senegal; Somalia; South Africa; Sudan; Ukraine; UAE; Uzbekistan; Vietnam


Belgium; Costa Rica; Czech Republic; Finland; France; Germany; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Montenegro; Romania; UK; US


Benin; Chile; Georgia; Honduras; Mexico; Nepal; Paraguay

Source link

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Experience the future of communication with the Yealink T54W This cutting-edge IP phone boasts a 4.3-inch color display, built-in Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, and support for up to 16 VoIP accounts Kitchen cabinets escabinetry.com from European countries