“He simply agreed with me,” the previous Trump spokesperson Katrina Pierson instructed the choose committee about her efforts to get audio system just like the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones faraway from the Jan. 6 rally. She had texted Mr. Meadows on Jan. 2, 2021, and requested, “Would you thoughts giving me a name concerning this Jan. 6 occasion? Issues have gotten loopy, and I desperately want some route. Please.”
He known as her nearly instantly — on the identical day Mr. Trump, with Mr. Meadows on the road, known as Mr. Raffensperger and requested him to seek out votes. The round nature of who was agreeing with whom is slightly maddening: When Larry Kudlow, then the pinnacle of the Nationwide Council of Financial Advisers, discovered in regards to the Raffensperger name, he berated Mr. Meadows, in keeping with Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker’s account. They report that Mr. Meadows instructed Mr. Kudlow: “I couldn’t cease the president. I attempted, however I couldn’t cease him.”
This goes on endlessly: Mr. Meadows did transition calls with President-elect Joe Biden’s incoming chief of workers, Ron Klain, and he texted Ms. Thomas about this being a combat between good and evil, as Ms. Haberman notes in her e book. He texted jokes backwards and forwards with a White Home adviser about Rudy Giuliani’s claims of useless voters, and organized a gathering between Mr. Giuliani and Senator Lindsey Graham about Mr. Giuliani’s claims, in accordance to the journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa. Mr. Meadows pushed again in opposition to the Trump lawyer Sidney Powell and Michael T. Flynn, a former nationwide safety adviser, throughout a prolonged assembly on the White Home, and handed alongside a conspiracy concept about an Italian firm altering votes to the Justice Division, in keeping with one former official’s committee testimony.
Within the final month, two prosecutors have used the identical occasions to cost the identical particular person, Mr. Trump, with a criminal offense. On their very own, in isolation, every indictment would make for the most important case in American historical past. As an alternative, these two prosecutions are occurring concurrently, like the most important doable experiment in how two prosecutors (or judges or juries) can method the identical problem.
The underlying scenario stays the identical, however the scope, fashion and tenor of the indictments are completely different. The federal case is narrower; the Georgia case is sprawling. The federal indictment is a doc meant to argue and justify its existence to the reader. The Georgia indictment requires the reader to observe together with 19 indictees chaotically weaving out and in of a story unfolding over years.